What was Thomas Aquinas' argument against Hermes Trismegistus?
"Thomas Aquinas’ critique of Hermes Trismegistus appears most clearly in Summa Contra Gentiles, Book III, Chapters 104–106, where Aquinas mounts an anti-magical polemic that challenges the metaphysical and moral foundations of Hermetic thought."
"🧠 Aquinas' Core Arguments Against Hermetic Magic
"Here’s a breakdown of Aquinas’ reasoning:
"1. Celestial Bodies vs. Intellectual Substances
- Aquinas disputes the Hermetic claim that magical operations derive their power from celestial bodies (e.g., stars, planetary alignments).
- He argues that while celestial bodies can influence natural phenomena, they cannot account for effects like animated statues or doors opening without physical contact.
- Instead, Aquinas posits that such effects must come from intellectual substances—i.e., spiritual beings (angels or demons)—not from the stars."
"2. Source of Magical Efficacy
- Hermetic magic often relies on significative words and figures, which Aquinas acknowledges may have real effects.
- However, he insists these effects stem from intellectual beings, not natural forces, and thus magic is not a science but a form of invocation or manipulation of spirits."
"3. Moral Character of Spirits
- Aquinas questions the moral disposition of the spirits invoked by magic.
- He argues that since magical acts often involve deception, coercion, or morally dubious outcomes, the spirits involved cannot be virtuous.
- Therefore, any power derived from them is suspect and spiritually dangerous."
"4. Rejection of Pagan Attribution
- Aquinas criticizes the Hermetic tradition for attributing magical powers to gods or divine forces.
- He sees this as a form of idolatry and a misinterpretation of metaphysical causality, replacing divine providence with occult determinism."
"🧙♂️ Hermeticism as a False Philosophy
"Aquinas’ broader critique is that Hermeticism conflates natural causality with spiritual manipulation, undermining both reason and faith. He treats Hermes Trismegistus not as a reliable philosopher but as a purveyor of dangerous illusions—one whose teachings blur the line between natural philosophy and demonic influence."
"You can explore a detailed reading of these chapters in this video lecture on Aquinas vs. Hermes Trismegistus."
"Would you like to map this critique onto Aquinas’ broader metaphysical framework—or explore how later thinkers like Ficino or [Giordano] Bruno reinterpreted Hermes in light of Christian theology?"
Did Aquinas ever assess Solomonic Magic?
"Yes, Thomas Aquinas did assess forms of magic that would later be associated with Solomonic traditions—particularly in Summa Theologica II-II, Question 96, Articles 2–4. While he doesn’t name 'Solomonic magic' directly, his critique encompasses practices central to the Solomonic corpus, such as:
"🧿 1. Astrological Talismans and Magical Images
- Aquinas condemns the use of astrological images and talismans, which are key components of Solomonic magical texts like the Key of Solomon.
- He argues that such objects do not operate through natural causality but through the invocation of spiritual beings—often demons—making their use superstitious and morally illicit."
"📜 2. Charms, Amulets, and Magical Words
- He critiques the use of verbal formulas, inscriptions, and physical charms intended to heal or protect.
- These practices, common in Solomonic magic, are deemed unlawful unless they operate through natural means or divine prayer. If they rely on hidden forces or spirits, Aquinas classifies them as superstition."
"🧠 3. Occult Forces and Hidden Knowledge
- Aquinas acknowledges that nature contains “occult” forces—hidden properties not yet understood by science.
- However, he draws a sharp line between natural occult phenomena (like magnetism) and magical manipulation of spirits. Solomonic magic, which often claims to harness angels or demons through ritual, falls into the latter category and is condemned."
"🕊️ 4. Invocation of Spirits
- Aquinas is particularly wary of any magical system that invokes spirits without divine sanction.
- Solomonic texts often claim to command spirits through divine names or seals, but Aquinas sees such practices as presumptuous and spiritually dangerous, aligning them with demonic influence rather than divine revelation."
"In short, while Aquinas doesn’t name Solomon or the Clavicula Salomonis directly, his theological framework decisively rejects the metaphysical and moral legitimacy of Solomonic magic. He sees it as a form of superstition that risks communion with malevolent spirits under the guise of sacred ritual."
"Would you like to explore how later Christian esotericists tried to reconcile Solomonic magic with Aquinas’ theology—or how Aquinas’ views shaped the Church’s stance on grimoires and ceremonial magic?"
https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/aquinas-on-the-occult
What texts exist in Judeo-Christian-Islamic Annals linking Solomon to magic?
"The figure of King Solomon is deeply entwined with magical traditions across Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, with numerous texts and legends attributing to him supernatural wisdom, control over spirits, and esoteric knowledge. Here's a structured overview of the key sources and motifs:
"📜 Judeo-Christian-Islamic Texts Linking Solomon to Magic
"🕍 Jewish Tradition
- Babylonian Talmud (Tractate Gittin 68a)
Describes Solomon using a magical ring engraved with the divine name to control demons and spirits. This ring—often called the Seal of Solomon—is central to later magical lore. - Testament of Solomon (1st–3rd century CE)
A pseudepigraphal text where Solomon interrogates and binds demons to build the Temple. It includes magical formulas, demon names, and angelic counterforces. Though not canonical, it heavily influenced later magical grimoires. - Sefer ha-Razim (Book of Mysteries)
A Jewish magical text attributed to the angel Raziel, sometimes linked to Solomonic wisdom. It includes rituals for invoking angels and spirits."
"✝️ Christian Tradition
- Christian Grimoires (e.g., Key of Solomon, Lemegeton, Clavicula Salomonis)
These medieval and Renaissance texts claim Solomonic authorship and detail ceremonial magic, spirit conjuration, and astrological talismans. They blend Jewish mysticism with Christian ritual. - Church Fathers and Scholastics
While figures like Aquinas condemned magical practices, they acknowledged Solomon’s legendary wisdom and the lore surrounding his control over spirits—often as a cautionary tale."
"☪️ Islamic Tradition
- Qur’an (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:102)
Refers to Solomon (Sulaiman) as a prophet who did not practice sorcery, but whose name was later misused by devils teaching magic in Babylon. This verse distances Solomon from magic while acknowledging the tradition. - Tafsir and Hadith Literature
Islamic exegesis elaborates on Solomon’s control over the jinn, his use of a divine ring, and his ability to speak with animals—often framed as miracles rather than magic. - Seal of Solomon
A powerful symbol in Islamic lore, said to be inscribed with sacred names and used to command jinn. It appears in mystical texts and talismanic traditions."
"🧠 Scholarly Resources
- 📘 Solomon the Esoteric King by Pablo Torijano Morales
Explores the development of Solomon’s magical persona in Jewish and Christian esoteric traditions. - 📄 Solomonic Magic: Texts, History, and Reception by Gal Sofer
A comprehensive academic study of Solomonic magical texts and their transmission across cultures. - 🪬 The Seal of Solomon – History and Symbolism
Details the ring’s role in Jewish and Islamic mystical traditions, including its use in commanding spirits."
"Would you like to trace how these traditions evolved into Renaissance ceremonial magic—or explore how Solomon’s image was reinterpreted in Kabbalah, Sufism, or Christian mysticism?"
https://brill.com/display/title/7586
https://www.academia.edu/108955003/Solomonic_Magic_Texts_History_and_Reception
https://knightstemplar.co/seal-of-solomon/
How does Aquinas view praying to the Saints? How is this different to invoking spirits?
"Thomas Aquinas draws a clear theological and metaphysical distinction between praying to the saints and invoking spirits, rooted in his understanding of divine order, charity, and moral agency."
"🙏 Praying to the Saints
"Aquinas affirms the legitimacy and spiritual value of praying to saints, especially in Summa Theologiae II-II, Q. 83, a. 4 and Supplement Q. 72:
"✅ Key Points:
- Intercessory Role: Saints are not the source of grace but intercede with God on our behalf. Prayer is directed through them, not to them as divine agents.
- Communion of Saints: Aquinas sees the saints as part of the mystical body of Christ. Their charity is perfected in heaven, and they desire our good.
- Knowledge of Prayers: Though saints do not comprehend the divine essence fully, Aquinas argues they know our prayers through God’s illumination, sufficient for intercession.
- Devotion Matters: Aquinas teaches that the efficacy of prayer often depends on the devotion of the one praying, even to 'lesser saints'."
"🧙♂️ Invoking Spirits (e.g., in Magic)
"In contrast, Aquinas condemns the invocation of spirits—especially in magical or occult contexts—as morally and metaphysically dangerous. This appears in Summa Contra Gentiles III.104–106 and Summa Theologiae II-II, Q. 96:
"❌ Key Points:
- Illicit Mediation: Invoking spirits (especially demons or unknown entities) bypasses divine order and risks communion with malevolent beings.
- Deception and Superstition: Magical invocation often involves hidden knowledge, coercion, or manipulation, which Aquinas sees as contrary to virtue and truth.
- No True Charity: Spirits invoked through magic do not act out of love or divine charity. Their aid is suspect and often deceptive.
- Violation of Divine Sovereignty: Magic seeks to control spiritual forces rather than submit to divine providence."
"⚖️ Summary: Theological Contrast
| Aspect | Praying to Saints | Invoking Spirits (Magic) |
|---|---|---|
| Source of Power | God alone; saints intercede | Spirits (often demons); power manipulated |
| Moral Framework | Charity, humility, communion | Coercion, secrecy, manipulation |
| Legitimacy | Affirmed by Church and Aquinas | Condemned as superstition and idolatry |
| Spiritual Risk | None; fosters holiness | High; opens door to deception and sin |
| Purpose | Petition for grace and aid | Control or influence over reality" |
"Would you like to explore how this distinction influenced later debates on angelic invocation, or how Aquinas’ views shaped Church doctrine on exorcism and spiritual discernment?"
https://www.newadvent.org/summa/5072.htm
https://catholicexchange.com/praying-to-the-saints-with-aquinas/
Binding demons was part of Solomonic Magical Practices. One sees people in the Church binding demons even today. How does the Church avoid charges of practicing magic?
