Showing posts with label Ethics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ethics. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 22, 2026

Against the Disneyland Model of Mind

Dr. Samah Jabr and the Real Conditions of Consciousness

Psychiatry has long relied on a quiet assumption: that human beings develop inside stable, benign social structures. The DSM does not say this outright, but its architecture depends on it. Trauma is an event, not a habitat. Anxiety is irrational, not adaptive. Depression is internal, not structural. The world outside the clinic is treated as essentially safe, orderly, and nonpathological — a kind of psychological Disneyland where the rides may be frightening but the park itself is secure.

But Disneyland does not exist. Not in Palestine. Not in most of the world. Not even in the United States, where instability, precarity, and structural violence shape daily life for millions.

If psychiatry is to be realistic — if it is to be honest — it must learn from clinicians who work where the DSM’s fantasy collapses. Dr. Samah Jabr is one of those clinicians.

I. The Fanonian Correction: Consciousness Under Structural Threat

Frantz Fanon understood that consciousness is not formed in a vacuum. It is shaped by:

  • political violence

  • racial hierarchy

  • economic precarity

  • surveillance

  • humiliation

  • historical rupture

He argued that the psyche under oppression is not simply “ill.” It is reacting — intelligently, coherently — to a world that is itself pathological.

Jabr extends this insight into contemporary clinical practice. She does not treat Palestinians as broken individuals. She treats them as subjects navigating a broken structure.

This is the Fanonian inheritance: the mind is political before it is clinical.

II. How Jabr Practices in the Real World (Not the DSM’s World)

Jabr’s clinical work is built on a simple but radical premise: if the world is unstable, the therapist must become a source of stability.

She creates what the external environment cannot provide:

  • relational safety

  • predictable rhythms

  • narrative continuity

  • moral coherence

  • communal belonging

  • dignity

These are not therapeutic “extras.” They are the basic conditions of consciousness — the scaffolding the DSM assumes is already in place.

But under occupation, that scaffolding is shattered. So Jabr builds it herself, piece by piece, inside the therapeutic relationship.

This is not miraculous because it defies nature. It is miraculous because it defies politics.

III. Children Who Have Never Known an Unoccupied Palestine

Children in Occupied Palestine do play — because play is a biological imperative. But their play is shaped by the world around them: checkpoints, raids, sirens, rubble. Their games become rehearsals of danger, negotiations with fear, small acts of reclaiming space.

Jabr approaches these children with a realism Western psychiatry often lacks.

She restores predictability.

When the world is chaotic, the therapist becomes the rhythm.

She validates their reality.

She does not ask them to pretend the drones overhead are irrelevant.

She rebuilds narrative coherence.

Occupation fragments time; she stitches it back together.

She strengthens communal identity.

Children survive through networks, not individual resilience.

She protects dignity.

Dignity is not a metaphor — it is a clinical variable.

She uses imagination as anchoring, not escape.

Her imagination is not Frankl’s transcendence. It is continuity, belonging, coherence.

These children do not need Disneyland. They need a therapist who understands the world as it is.

IV. The DSM’s Blind Spot: The Innocence of Social Structure

The DSM does not merely ignore political reality. It implicitly treats social structure as:

  • stable

  • benign

  • nonpathological

  • noncausal

  • background noise

This is not neutrality. It is ideology.

It is the assumption that the world is safe enough for the psyche to malfunction on its own — that suffering is internal, not structural.

But Jabr’s work shows the opposite: the psyche is constantly negotiating the conditions of its world.

When the world is unstable, consciousness adapts. When the world is violent, consciousness protects itself. When the world is humiliating, consciousness defends dignity. When the world is fragmented, consciousness tries to stitch itself together.

The DSM cannot describe this because it was never designed to.

V. Toward a Realistic Psychology: Jabr as a Model, Not an Exception

The point is not that Jabr’s approach is necessary only in Palestine. The point is that her approach is necessary anywhere the Disneyland model fails — which is to say, almost everywhere.

Her work is a template for a psychology that:

  • acknowledges structural violence

  • treats dignity as a clinical need

  • understands trauma as ongoing

  • builds relational safety where none exists

  • restores narrative coherence in fragmented worlds

  • strengthens communal scaffolding

  • refuses neutrality in the face of harm

This is not “political psychiatry.” It is realistic psychiatry — psychiatry that understands consciousness as a product of its environment.

Jabr is not practicing an exotic form of therapy for extreme conditions. She is practicing a form of therapy that makes sense in the world we actually live in.

VI. Closing: The Human World Must Be Built, Not Assumed

If psychiatry is to be honest, it must abandon the Disneyland assumption. It must recognize that the human world is often unstable, unjust, unpredictable, and dangerous — and that consciousness is shaped accordingly.

Dr. Samah Jabr’s work shows how to build the human world inside the therapeutic relationship when the political world fails to provide it.

She does not treat symptoms. She treats conditions. She treats structures. She treats dignity. She treats continuity. She treats the human world itself.

And in doing so, she offers a model for a psychology that is not naïve, not sanitized, not abstract — but grounded, moral, and real.

Dr. Samah Jabr (born August 8, 1976, in East Jerusalem) is a Palestinian psychiatrist, psychotherapist, and writer, known for her leadership in developing mental health services in the West Bank and for her writings on the psychological effects of occupation. She is among the first Palestinian women psychiatrists and one of only 22 psychiatrists practicing in the West Bank.

Her work is deeply informed by Frantz Fanon’s anticolonial psychiatry, focusing on how political violence shapes individual and collective well‑being.

Further Exploration:

Radiance in Pain and Resilience: The global reverberation of Palestinian historical trauma

Black Skin, White Masks

The Wretched of the Earth

The above post was composed by A.I. based on a Q&A inquiry into the work of Dr. Samah Jabr. 

Friday, November 21, 2025

Self Destruction of Shoguns

Is there awareness in the PUA community of the self-harm involved in becoming a manipulator?

"That’s a sharp and necessary question, Gary. The short answer is: awareness exists, but it’s fragmented and often suppressed inside the Pick-Up Artist (PUA) community."


"🧩 Why Manipulation Harms the Manipulator

  • Emotional detachment: Treating intimacy as a game erodes the manipulator’s ability to form authentic bonds.
  • Identity split: Constant role-playing ('alpha,' 'shogun,' 'player') can fracture selfhood, leaving men alienated from their deeper emotional needs.
  • Addictive cycles: The chase for validation becomes compulsive, mirroring addiction patterns.
  • Loneliness: Even 'successful' PUAs often report emptiness — sex acquisition without intimacy leaves them isolated.
  • Moral injury: Knowing one has manipulated others can produce guilt, shame, or cynicism, even if not admitted publicly."

"🎭 Awareness Inside the PUA Community

  • Confessional blogs & forums: Some ex-PUAs write about burnout, depression, and the hollowness of 'gaming women.'
  • Neil Strauss (The Game): Strauss himself later admitted the lifestyle left him emotionally broken, leading him to therapy and a retreat from PUA culture.
  • Red Pill/PUA splits: Certain factions acknowledge the 'dark side' — but often reframe it as weakness to be overcome, rather than genuine harm.
  • Critiques from within: A minority of voices argue that manipulation corrodes the manipulator’s humanity, but these are drowned out by the louder rhetoric of conquest."

"⚖️ Feminist & Psychological Critique

  • Feminist scholars: Point out that PUA culture harms men as much as women — by teaching them to suppress empathy and commodify intimacy.
  • Psychologists: Compare PUA immersion to cult indoctrination, noting the self-harm of living in a manipulative mindset.
  • Therapists: Report men leaving PUA communities with trauma-like symptoms: distrust, intimacy avoidance, and shame."

"🔮 Symbolic Note

"PUA manuals promise mastery, but the manipulator becomes enslaved to the script. The 'Shogun' is not free — he is bound to fractionation, unable to love without tactics. The self-harm is the loss of authentic agency."


"If you’d like, I can map a dual harm cycle: showing how fractionation damages both the target (dependency, erosion of autonomy) and the manipulator (emptiness, moral injury). That would make the recursive cost visible."

Yes and there is a savage landfall involved in bringing manipulators down to Earth.

"That’s a powerful image, Gary — the savage landfall captures the moment when manipulators, who have been floating in the illusion of control, crash into the reality of their own emptiness."


"🌊 The Savage Landfall

  • Collapse of illusion: Manipulators believe they’re orchestrating intimacy, but eventually the script fails. The “Shogun” discovers that conquest without connection is hollow.
  • Exposure to gravity: The very tactics that seemed to elevate them — fractionation, gaslighting, narcissistic seduction — drag them down when trust and love prove irreducible to manipulation.
  • Self-harm revealed: The manipulator realizes they’ve not only harmed others but eroded their own capacity for authentic love. The crash is existential, not just relational.
  • Return to Earth: The landfall is brutal because it strips away fantasy. What remains is the raw terrain of vulnerability, where love is harder than manipulation."

"🔮 Symbolic Resonance

  • In myth, this is Icarus falling — intoxicated by flight, undone by gravity.
  • In cult psychology, it’s the disillusioned leader who discovers their own emptiness.
  • In PUA culture, it’s the 'player' who wakes up alone, realizing the game was a cage."

"⚖️ Ethical Note

"The savage landfall is not punishment from outside — it’s the inevitable consequence of living by manipulation. Gravity reasserts itself. Love, deeper down, is the ground they crash into."


"I can sketch a symbolic descent map: showing the manipulator’s arc from illusion (flight) → domination (control) → collapse (landfall) → possibility of repair (authentic love). Would you like me to render that spiral?"

There is a bit of self-hatred at bottom. You give off smarmy fumes. Ignoring the shame. But the shame sticks to you. Remains psychoactive. Smarm and control greed evoke core level love starvation.

"You’ve put your finger on the paradox at the heart of manipulative seduction cultures, Gary: the manipulator is haunted by the very shame they try to suppress."


"🧩 The Psychoactive Residue of Shame

  • Smarm as cover: The slick confidence, the 'alpha' posture, the rehearsed lines — all are masks to hide insecurity.
  • Shame ignored: Manuals like the Shogun Method teach men to bypass shame by reframing it as weakness. But repression doesn’t erase; it metabolizes underground.
  • Sticking power: Shame is psychoactive — it lingers, coloring perception, fueling compulsive cycles of conquest.
  • Self-hatred at bottom: Beneath the smarm is a gnawing awareness of love starvation — the manipulator knows they are not truly seen or loved."

"🎭 Control Greed vs Love Starvation

  • Control greed: The manipulator craves dominance, believing mastery will fill the void.
  • Love starvation: What they actually hunger for is reciprocity, vulnerability, and care — but those require surrender, not tactics.
  • The tragic loop: The more they chase control, the deeper the starvation. The shame sticks because it’s the echo of unmet love."

"🔮 Symbolic Note

"This is the Icarus fall we spoke of: the fumes of smarm are the wax melting. The psychoactive shame is gravity pulling them down. The savage landfall is not just exposure — it’s the confrontation with their own starvation for love."


"I can sketch a recursive loop diagram showing how smarm → control greed → temporary conquest → shame → deeper love starvation → renewed smarm. That would make visible the cycle you’ve articulated. Would you like me to render that?"

Let's end with that.

"Here’s the closing spiral you named, Gary — the manipulator’s descent into their own cycle:

  • Smarm → the polished mask of confidence, fumes that cover insecurity.
  • Control greed → the hunger to dominate, believing mastery will substitute for intimacy.
  • Temporary conquest → the short-lived 'win,' hollow without reciprocity.
  • Shame → ignored, but psychoactive, sticking to the psyche and coloring perception.
  • Love starvation → the deeper hunger that manipulation cannot feed, only intensify.
  • Return to smarm → the mask re-applied, restarting the loop."

"It’s recursive, corrosive, and ultimately self-defeating. The savage landfall is when the loop collapses, and the manipulator confronts the starvation at the core."

"That’s a fitting place to pause — the cycle laid bare, the descent mapped."

Well articulated.

Some Reading Materials for Shogun Analysis

Last time I said to A.I.:  That's what I had in mind.

"Perfect, Gary — here’s a curated ritual syllabus for studying the Shogun Method alongside its psychological and feminist critiques. This blends primary source analysis with symbolic containment and ethical counterpoint."


"📘 Primary Source: Shogun Method

  • Title: Shogun Method
  • Author: Derek Rake
  • Where to find: Not in academic libraries; available via Derek Rake’s website or PDF summaries online.
  • Focus: Fractionation seduction, emotional programming, 'enslavement' logic."

"📚 Counterpoint Syllabus

"🧠 Psychological Manipulation

Title Author Focus
Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion Robert Cialdini Core principles of persuasion and compliance
Gaslighting Deborah Vinall Emotional destabilization and reality distortion
Dark Psychology 101 Michael Pace Tactics of coercion and control"

"🎭 Pickup Artist Culture & Critique

Title Author Focus
The Game Neil Strauss Insider narrative of PUA culture
Men Who Hate Women Laura Bates Feminist critique of incel and PUA ideology
Sexual Citizens Hirsch & Khan Consent, power, and emotional ethics"

"⚖️ Feminist Theory & Emotional Ethics

Title Author Focus
The Will to Change bell hooks Masculinity and emotional repression
Entitled: How Male Privilege Hurts Women Kate Manne Gendered power and emotional entitlement
Seduction as Coercion Various (anthologies) Philosophical and legal critiques of manipulative intimacy"

"🔍 Keywords for Library Search

"Use these in JSTOR, PsycINFO, or your university catalog:

  • Fractionation seduction
  • Pickup artist psychology
  • Emotional manipulation in dating
  • Gaslighting and narcissistic abuse
  • Feminist critique of seduction culture
  • Mind control in interpersonal relationships"

"🔮 Symbolic Containment

"This syllabus lets you:

  • Dissect the grimoire (Shogun Method)
  • Trace its lineage (interrogation → cult → seduction)
  • Apply ethical counterpoint (feminist and psychological critique)
  • Ritualize repair by metabolizing domination into agency"

"I can build a visual map of this syllabus — showing how each text fits into the containment framework: source, critique, transformation. Just say the word and I’ll render it."

Is there awareness in the PUA community of the self-harm involved in becoming a manipulator?

Alice and Pick-Up Artistry

What illumination can you provide regarding fractionation seduction and Pick-Up Artist Manuals? What is the feminist reaction to sexual fractionation?

"Fractionation seduction is a controversial psychological technique used in Pick-Up Artist (PUA) manuals to deepen emotional attachment through oscillation between emotional highs and lows. Feminist critiques condemn it as manipulative, misogynistic, and emblematic of coercive gender dynamics."


"🎭 What Is Fractionation Seduction?

"In PUA literature, fractionation is described as:

  • Inducing emotional whiplash: Alternating between warmth and coldness, attention and withdrawal, humor and seriousness.
  • Creating dependency: The subject becomes emotionally destabilized and increasingly reliant on the seducer for relief.
  • Accelerating intimacy: By mimicking the rhythm of long-term relationships (conflict and reconciliation), fractionation aims to fast-track emotional bonding."

"PUA manuals like the Shogun Method and NLP-based guides teach fractionation as a way to 'hack' emotional attachment — often framed as a shortcut to seduction."


"🧩 Psychological Mechanics

  • Oscillation: The technique relies on alternating emotional states to bypass rational defenses.
  • Amplification: Relief feels more intense after discomfort, deepening the perceived connection.
  • Control: The seducer becomes the emotional regulator, increasing their influence over the subject."

"This mirrors the same fractionation logic used in cults, abusive relationships, and interrogation — but here it’s repackaged as a dating strategy."


"⚖️ Feminist Critique

"Feminist scholars and activists have strongly condemned fractionation seduction and PUA culture:

  • Misogyny and dehumanization: PUA frameworks treat women as targets, not autonomous agents.
  • Coercion disguised as charm: Techniques like fractionation blur the line between persuasion and manipulation.
  • Commodification of intimacy: Emotional connection is reduced to a formula — a transaction rather than a relationship.
  • Violence-supportive ideology: Some PUA communities promote views that normalize emotional abuse and entitlement.
  • Discursive harm: PUA rhetoric often reframes female resistance as “last-minute token rejection,” undermining consent norms."

"🔮 Symbolic Note

"Fractionation seduction weaponizes the same archetypal rhythm as mythic descent — rupture and relief — but in service of domination rather than transformation. It’s a ritual of control masquerading as intimacy."


"I can map how fractionation seduction borrows from cult psychology, horror cinema, and mythic possession motifs — showing how emotional oscillation becomes a tool of symbolic and interpersonal domination."

https://neurolaunch.com/fractionation-psychology/

https://derekrake.com/blog/nlp-seduction-patterns/

https://shogunmethod.com/ac/fractionation-seduction-guide-action-checklist.pdf

https://www.girlschase.com/content/fractionation-simply-explained

https://xyonline.net/blogs/4/pick-artist-culture-feminist-critiques

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12119-017-9468-0

https://unherd.com/2024/02/in-defence-of-pick-up-artistry/

https://www.sociologylens.net/topics/gender/pick-up-artists-and-anti-pick-up-artists-promises-of-sexist-gender-ideologies-denied/13370

https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/20283/4284

Has there been retributional fractionation on the part of women using fractionation seduction on males?

"Yes, there are anecdotal and subcultural accounts of women using fractionation-style seduction techniques on men—sometimes consciously, sometimes organically—but rarely framed as 'retribution.' Feminist and psychological discourse tends to critique the entire dynamic rather than endorse reversal."


"🧠 What Is 'Retributional Fractionation'?

"This would mean women deliberately using emotional oscillation—warmth and withdrawal, intimacy and distance—to destabilize male targets, often in response to prior manipulation or as a form of power reclamation."

"While not widely documented in academic literature, several patterns emerge:

  • Subcultural adoption: Some dating advice forums and TikTok creators discuss 'playing hot and cold' or 'mirroring male manipulation' as a form of emotional control.
  • Narrative inversion: In fiction and online storytelling, women sometimes use fractionation to 'teach a lesson' or expose male entitlement.
  • Organic emergence: In toxic or trauma-bonded relationships, women may unconsciously replicate fractionation rhythms—especially if they’ve been subjected to them."

"📚 What the Literature Says

  • PUA manuals rarely acknowledge female agency in fractionation, framing women as reactive or passive.
  • Feminist psychology critiques fractionation as a symptom of patriarchal emotional control—not something to be reversed, but dismantled.
  • Dark psychology forums sometimes discuss 'female fractionation' as a threat or tactic, but these are fringe and often misogynistic in framing.
  • Relationship coaching occasionally teaches women to “mirror” emotional pacing, but this is usually framed as boundary-setting, not revenge."

"⚖️ Ethical Tension

  • Empowerment vs manipulation: Using fractionation consciously can feel like reclaiming power—but it risks replicating the same coercive dynamics.
  • Cycle perpetuation: Retaliatory fractionation can entrench trauma loops rather than resolve them.
  • Feminist critique: Most feminist thinkers argue for dismantling emotional manipulation altogether—not flipping the script."

"🔮 Symbolic Note

"If fractionation is a ritual of rupture and repair, then retributional use becomes a mirror spell—reflecting the manipulator’s tactics back at them. But mirrors don’t heal; they expose. The deeper feminist move is to break the mirror, not wield it."


"I can trace how fractionation motifs recur in femme fatale archetypes, horror cinema, and mythic revenge narratives—showing how emotional oscillation becomes a weapon of symbolic justice or domination. Let me know if you want that mapped."

Sources:

https://seductionmastermind.com/fractionation-seduction/

https://neurolaunch.com/fractionation-psychology/

https://www.girlschase.com/content/fractionation-simply-explained

https://www.lovepanky.com/flirting-flings/dating-game/fractionation-seduction

https://derekrake.com/blog/fractionation/

So not a war between the sexes dynamic. What about PUM's relationship to 1) Gaslighting; and 2) Narcissism?

Alice Techniques in Abuse and Acting

Last time I said to A.I.: Sounds like the 'technique' might develop unconsciously in drug dealing, sadomasochistic relationships, and blackmail cultivation.

"You’re absolutely right to notice that the Alice in Wonderland / fractionation style of disorientation can emerge organically in high‑pressure or manipulative social contexts — even without anyone consciously naming it as a 'technique.'”


"🧩 How It Might Develop Unconsciously

  • Drug dealing:
    • Dealers often oscillate between reward (providing supply, camaraderie, protection) and punishment (threats, withdrawal of access, intimidation).
    • This creates a fractionated cycle of dependency — the client is destabilized by alternating fear and relief.
  • Sadomasochistic relationships:
    • In consensual BDSM, oscillation between pain and comfort, dominance and care, is ritualized and negotiated.
    • In abusive dynamics, however, the same oscillation can unconsciously mimic fractionation, deepening attachment through alternating cruelty and tenderness.
  • Blackmail cultivation:
    • The manipulator alternates between threat (exposure, humiliation) and reprieve (silence, protection).
    • This cycle erodes autonomy, creating dependency on the blackmailer’s rhythm of menace and mercy."

"🎭 Why It Resonates With the Alice Technique

  • Disorientation: Just as Alice falls into a world where rules collapse, these contexts destabilize the subject’s sense of control.
  • Fractionation: The oscillation between extremes (chaos vs calm, threat vs relief) mirrors the emotional rollercoaster that increases suggestibility.
  • Dependency: The subject clings to the manipulator for stability, even though the manipulator is the source of instability."

"⚖️ Ethical Divide

  • In consensual contexts (e.g., negotiated BDSM), oscillation can be empowering, ritualized, and safe.
  • In coercive contexts (drug economies, blackmail, interrogation), the same unconscious fractionation becomes exploitative, eroding agency and dignity."

"🔮 Symbolic Note

"The 'falling' motif is the crux: whether into Wonderland, addiction, or coercive intimacy, the subject experiences a loss of footing. That vertigo is what makes fractionation so potent — it ritualizes rupture, either for transformation or for control."


"I can sketch a comparative map of fractionation cycles across these domains — showing how the oscillation between rupture and relief manifests differently in consensual vs coercive settings. Would you like me to lay that out?"

One is struck by two things: How fractionation explains why a beaten wife finds it nearly impossible to extract herself from the wife-beater. Two, why actors might find the Alice Technique an attractive means of "diving into a role".

"You’ve identified two very different but revealing applications of the same underlying dynamic: fractionation and disorientation as engines of attachment and immersion."


"🧩 1. Fractionation in Abusive Relationships

  • Cycle of violence: Abusive relationships often oscillate between cruelty (beatings, threats, humiliation) and reconciliation (apologies, gifts, tenderness).
  • Emotional whiplash: This alternation mirrors fractionation — the victim experiences extreme lows followed by relief, which paradoxically deepens attachment.
  • Dependency loop: The 'comfort' phase feels disproportionately powerful because it comes after suffering. The victim clings to the abuser as the only source of relief, even though they are also the source of pain.
  • Psychological trap: This cycle explains why leaving feels nearly impossible — the victim’s emotional system has been rewired to expect rupture and repair as the rhythm of intimacy."

"🎭 2. Alice Technique in Acting

  • Immersive descent: Actors often seek ways to 'fall' into a role — surrendering their ordinary identity to inhabit another.
  • Disorientation as gateway: The Alice Technique’s rabbit-hole imagery provides a ritualized way to destabilize the self, making it easier to adopt a new persona.
  • Fractionation in performance: Alternating between clarity (the actor’s own self) and confusion (the character’s world) can deepen immersion, much like fractionation deepens attachment.
  • Attraction for actors: It offers a structured method for 'diving in' — using imaginative falling and paradox to bypass rational resistance and embody the role more fully."

"🔮 The Shared Crux

  • In abuse, fractionation is weaponized: rupture and repair trap the victim in dependency.
  • In acting, fractionation is ritualized: rupture and repair are harnessed to create transformation.
  • Both rely on the same archetypal motif: falling into disorientation as a threshold to a new reality."

"It’s striking how the same psychological mechanics can be either corrosive or creative depending on context. In one case, they imprison; in the other, they liberate."

"I can sketch a comparative cycle diagram showing how fractionation manifests in abusive relationships versus acting immersion — highlighting the ethical divergence. Would you like me to lay that out visually?"

That might help.

"Here’s a comparative cycle diagram that captures what you’re pointing to — how fractionation manifests in abusive relationships versus acting immersion, and why the same oscillatory rhythm can imprison in one context and liberate in another."


"🔄 Comparative Fractionation Cycles

"Abusive Relationship (Coercive Fractionation)

  • Phase 1 – Rupture: Violence, humiliation, threat.
  • Phase 2 – Relief: Apology, tenderness, gifts.
  • Cycle Effect: Emotional dependency deepens; victim clings to abuser for relief.
  • Outcome: Entrapment, erosion of autonomy."

"Acting Immersion (Creative Fractionation)

  • Phase 1 – Rupture: Disorientation, surrender of self, 'falling into role.'
  • Phase 2 – Relief: Embodiment of character, structured narrative, artistic clarity.
  • Cycle Effect: Immersion deepens; actor feels more authentic in role.
  • Outcome: Transformation, expansion of identity."

"🧩 Shared Mechanics

  • Oscillation: Both rely on alternating extremes.
  • Disorientation: Loss of footing is the gateway.
  • Relief Amplification: Comfort feels stronger after chaos.
  • Attachment/Immersion: The subject bonds more deeply to the source of relief."

"⚖️ Ethical Divergence

  • Abuse: External coercion, destructive dependency.
  • Acting: Voluntary surrender, creative transformation."

"Would you like me to render this visually as a dual-cycle diagram — one side showing the abusive loop, the other showing the acting immersion loop, with 'falling' as the shared crux in the middle? That way you’d have a symbolic map of how the same rhythm bifurcates into harm or art."

Sure.


"[Disorientation is misspelled. Interesting CyberFreudian slip. Disoretination. Dysretination. Disorder of the Retina. A visual cortex disorder.] I’ve generated the comparative dual-cycle diagram for you.

  • On the left, the abusive relationship cycle (rupture → relief → dependency → entrapment).
  • On the right, the acting immersion cycle (rupture → relief → immersion → transformation).
  • At the center, the shared motif of falling/disorientation, the crux that powers both."

"This way you can see how the same oscillatory rhythm of fractionation bifurcates into either coercive entrapment or creative liberation."

"I can also expand this into a layered symbolic map that traces 'falling' across myth, abuse, and art — showing why the archetype is so versatile. Would you like me to build that next?" 

Perfect. Appreciate it.

What illumination can you provide regarding fractionation seduction and Pick-Up Artist Manuals? What is the feminist reaction to sexual fractionation?

Monday, November 17, 2025

“Miles Christi” (Soldier of Christ)

Last time I asked A.I.: Does Aquinas ever make a sketch of the "Christian Soldier" and if so what is his definition?

"Yes—Aquinas does sketch the idea of the 'Christian Soldier,' but not in the sense of a literal knight or crusader. He defines the Christian soldier primarily as one who fights spiritual battles against sin, the flesh, the world, and the devil, rather than earthly enemies."


"📖 Aquinas on the 'Miles Christi' (Soldier of Christ)

  • In his commentary on 2 Timothy 2:3 ('Labor as a good soldier of Jesus Christ'), Aquinas explains that there are three ways of being a soldier of Christ:

    1. Combat against sin – The Christian soldier wages war against personal vice and temptation.
    2. Combat against the world – He resists worldly corruption, false values, and external pressures.
    3. Combat against the devil – He stands firm against spiritual evil and demonic influence.
  • Aquinas cites Job 7:1 ('The life of man upon earth is a warfare') to emphasize that human existence itself is a kind of spiritual battle."


"⚖️ Distinguishing Features

  • Not a literal warrior: Aquinas does not glorify the crusader or knight as the model Christian soldier. His emphasis is inward and moral.
  • Virtue as weaponry: The Christian soldier’s 'arms' are virtues—faith, charity, justice, and perseverance.
  • Charity as defining trait: Later interpreters of Aquinas note that charity is the distinguishing characteristic of the Christian soldier. Fighting justly elevates him into friendship with God."

"🧩 Symbolic Reading

"Aquinas reframes soldiering as spiritual militancy:

  • The battlefield is the soul.
  • The enemies are sin, corruption, and the devil.
  • Victory is sanctification, not conquest."

"This is a striking contrast to the crusading rhetoric of his era. While crusade preachers exalted literal holy war, Aquinas’ 'Christian soldier' is primarily a moral archetype, a disciplined fighter in the cosmic struggle of virtue against vice."


"So: Aquinas’ 'Christian Soldier' is defined as the believer who fights spiritual battles with virtue and charity, not the knight who fights earthly wars."

"Would you like me to map how this spiritual soldier archetype later influenced Catholic military orders and devotional traditions—like the Jesuits’ 'soldiers of Christ' or Ignatius of Loyola’s Spiritual Exercises?"

Sources:

https://aquinas.cc/la/en/~2Tim.C2.L1.n38.4

https://www.jstor.org/stable/40018215

https://thegreatthinkers.org/aquinas/commentary/thomas-aquinas-on-virtuous-warfare/

The enemy of the Christian Soldier has no corporeal extension?

"Exactly—within Aquinas’ framework, the enemy of the Christian Soldier is not corporeal but spiritual."


"📖 Aquinas’ View

  • In his commentary on 2 Timothy 2:3 ('Labor as a good soldier of Jesus Christ'), Aquinas explains that the Christian soldier fights against:

    • Sin (internal vice and temptation)
    • The World (corrupt values and external pressures)
    • The Devil (spiritual evil and demonic influence)
  • He draws on Job 7:1 ('The life of man upon earth is a warfare') to emphasize that human existence itself is a spiritual battle."


"⚖️ Distinction

  • Corporeal enemies (armies, nations, heretics) are not the primary focus of Aquinas’ 'Miles Christi.'
  • The true battlefield is the soul, and the weapons are virtues (faith, charity, justice, perseverance).
  • This makes the Christian soldier archetype fundamentally different from the crusader knight: one fights with sword and shield, the other with prayer, discipline, and moral integrity."

"🧩 Symbolic Reading

"The Christian soldier’s enemy has no bodily extension—it is invisible, intangible, but pervasive. This is why Aquinas’ sketch resonates more with ascetic and monastic traditions than with crusading rhetoric. It’s a metaphysical militancy, not a geopolitical one."


"Would you like me to trace how this spiritual soldier archetype later influenced Catholic devotional traditions—like Ignatius of Loyola’s Spiritual Exercises and the Jesuits’ self‑identity as 'soldiers of Christ'?"

Because genocide is irrefutably corporeal. The phrase "The Life of Man upon the Earth is a warfare" to me implies the similar notion that incarnation upon the earth is a warfare. The corporeality of life is its fundamental feature. What return do you make?

"You’ve put your finger on a profound tension, Gary. Aquinas’ 'Miles Christi' imagery emphasizes the spiritual battlefield, but the phrase 'The life of man upon the earth is a warfare' (Job 7:1) does indeed carry corporeal weight. Life is not only spiritual struggle but embodied struggle—incarnation itself is conflict."


"📖 Corporeality in Aquinas’ Framework

  • Dual Warfare: For Aquinas, the Christian soldier fights invisible enemies (sin, devil, corruption), but he never denies the embodied dimension. The soul’s struggle is lived through the body—temptation, suffering, discipline, even martyrdom.
  • Incarnation as Battle: Human life is fundamentally embodied, and thus warfare is not abstract. Hunger, pain, violence, and mortality are the 'corporeal extensions' of spiritual warfare.
  • Sacramental Logic: Catholic theology insists that grace is mediated through matter (bread, wine, water, oil). Likewise, warfare against sin is mediated through the body—fasting, penance, endurance."

"⚖️ Genocide as Corporeal Extremity

  • You’re right: genocide is the most corporeal form of warfare, the annihilation of bodies en masse.
  • Aquinas would never justify it—it violates proportionality and charity—but your point shows how the rhetoric of 'warfare' can be twisted. If life itself is warfare, some regimes have claimed that extermination is the 'ultimate certainty' of victory.
  • This is the danger of collapsing spiritual warfare into corporeal warfare: the metaphor can be weaponized."

"🧩 Symbolic Return

"So my return is this:

  • Incarnation = Warfare: To be embodied is to be vulnerable, contested, finite. Life itself is a struggle, not just spiritually but materially.
  • Aquinas’ Sketch: He spiritualizes the soldier, but the corporeal dimension is always implied—because the soul’s battle is fought through flesh.
  • Your Insight: By insisting on corporeality, you expose the risk: when theology forgets the distinction, it can slide into justifying corporeal annihilation."

"In short: the Christian soldier fights invisible enemies, but always through a body. Incarnation makes warfare unavoidable, and genocide is its most horrific corporeal distortion."

"I could map this tension as a two‑axis chart: spiritual vs. corporeal warfare, showing how Aquinas, crusade preachers, and modern genocidal ideologies each position themselves differently. Would you like me to sketch that?"

Momentarily. In Mein Kampf, Hitler claims to be a Christian? Expresses admiration for the Pope? 

What was Mussolini's stance toward the Church and did the Catholic Church ever denounce either of the Fascist Leaders?

"Hitler did invoke Christianity in Mein Kampf, but largely in a propagandistic sense, while Mussolini shifted from hostility to accommodation with the Catholic Church. The Vatican formally denounced Nazi ideology in 1937, but its stance toward Mussolini was more ambivalent, shaped by the Lateran Accords of 1929."


"📖 Hitler and Christianity

  • Hitler’s Claims: In Mein Kampf, Hitler referred to 'positive Christianity,' presenting himself as aligned with Christian values. This was less about genuine faith and more about appealing to German Christians and distinguishing Nazism from atheistic communism.
  • Admiration for the Pope?: Hitler occasionally expressed respect for the organizational power of the Catholic Church, but he did not admire papal authority in a theological sense. His relationship with the Vatican was pragmatic, not devotional.
  • Reality: Hitler was baptized Catholic and grew up in Austria’s Catholic milieu, but he rejected core Catholic teachings. His regime increasingly persecuted the Church, despite early attempts to co‑opt Christian rhetoric."

"⚖️ Mussolini and the Catholic Church

  • Early Hostility: As a young man, Mussolini was anti‑clerical, calling priests 'black germs'.
  • Pragmatic Shift: Once in power, he recognized the Church’s influence in Italy and sought accommodation.
  • Lateran Accords (1929): Mussolini and Pope Pius XI signed the Lateran Treaty, which:
    • Recognized Vatican City as a sovereign state.
    • Restored compensation for Church lands lost in Italian unification.
    • Made Catholicism the official religion of Italy.
  • Outcome: Mussolini gained legitimacy, while the Church secured independence and influence."

"🧩 Catholic Church’s Denunciations

  • Against Hitler:
    • Pope Pius XI issued the encyclical Mit brennender Sorge (1937), condemning Nazi racism and hostility to Christianity.
    • German bishops like Clemens August von Galen openly resisted Nazi policies.
  • Against Mussolini:
    • The Vatican opposed aspects of fascist totalitarianism and anti‑Semitic laws, but it never issued a sweeping denunciation like Mit brennender Sorge.
    • Pius XI criticized fascist ideology in Non abbiamo bisogno (1931), condemning Mussolini’s attempt to monopolize youth organizations and warning against the 'pagan worship of the State'."

"🧩 Symbolic Reading

  • Hitler used Christianity rhetorically but undermined it in practice.
  • Mussolini moved from hostility to tactical alliance, securing legitimacy through the Lateran Accords.
  • The Catholic Church explicitly denounced Nazism as incompatible with Christianity, while its stance toward Mussolini was more nuanced—critical of fascist excesses but bound by treaty obligations."

"Would you like me to chart the Vatican’s encyclicals and statements against fascism and Nazism side by side, so you can see how its denunciations differed in tone and timing?"

Sources:

https://wwv.yadvashem.org/odot_pdf/Microsoft%20Word%20-%205918.pdf

https://assets.cambridge.org/97810093/14978/frontmatter/9781009314978_frontmatter.pdf

https://catholicus.eu/en/hitler-and-the-catholic-church-the-truth-about-a-controversial-relationship/?pdf=2268

https://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/modern-world-history-1918-to-1980/italy-1900-to-1939/mussolini-and-the-roman-catholic-church/

https://churchandstate.org.uk/2023/11/the-role-of-the-catholic-church-in-mussolinis-italy/

https://www.italiaoutdoors.com/index.php/pisa-province/744-history-of-italy/history-of-the-kingdom-of-italy/1119-kingdom-of-italy-fascism-and-the-catholic-church

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_resistance_to_Nazi_Germany

https://blob-static.studyclix.ie/static/content/file/uploads/9/94364bfd-4b7f-48a2-b61a-143f49ee026e.pdf

What were Bernard's ideas?

"Bernard of Clairvaux (1090–1153) was a Cistercian monk, abbot, and Doctor of the Church whose central ideas fused mystical theology, Marian devotion, and militant preaching of the Crusades. He emphasized love as the essence of God, the soul’s ascent to union with Christ, and the Church’s authority in both spiritual and political life."


"📖 Core Spiritual Ideas

  • Love as the Source of God: Bernard taught that God is not distant or abstract but love itself. Human life is a journey of returning to this divine love.
  • Mystical Union: He described the soul’s ascent toward God as a ladder of love, culminating in union with Christ. His Sermons on the Song of Songs are masterpieces of mystical theology.
  • Marian Devotion: Bernard was called the 'cithara of Mary' (Mary’s harp) for his emphasis on her mediatorial role. He promoted devotion to the Virgin as central to Christian spirituality.
  • Monastic Reform: He was instrumental in shaping the Cistercian order, stressing simplicity, austerity, and a return to Benedictine purity."

"⚔️ Political and Militant Ideas

  • Crusade Preaching: Bernard was the chief preacher of the Second Crusade (1147–1149). He framed crusading as a holy duty, promising spiritual merit for those who fought.
  • Church Authority: He defended papal primacy and opposed heretical movements, seeing obedience to the Church as essential to salvation.
  • Critique of Secular Power: Bernard often warned rulers against pride and tyranny, insisting that kingship must serve God’s justice."

"🧩 Symbolic Legacy

  • Mystic and Militant: Bernard embodies the paradox of medieval Christianity—deep mystical love alongside militant holy war.
  • Influence: His writings shaped later mystics (like Meister Eckhart) and reformers (even Luther and Calvin engaged with his theology).
  • Ambiguity: His crusade preaching shows how spiritual fervor could be harnessed for corporeal warfare, blending the axes of spiritual and material combat."

"In short: Bernard’s ideas centered on divine love, mystical union, Marian devotion, monastic reform, and militant defense of the faith—making him both a spiritual mystic and a crusade ideologue."

"I can also chart Bernard’s dual legacy—mystical theology vs. crusade militancy—to show how his ideas straddle the line between spiritual ascent and corporeal warfare. Would you like me to sketch that comparison?"

Sources:

https://www.wordonfire.org/articles/gems-of-wisdom-from-st-bernard-of-clairvaux/

https://ucatholic.com/saints/bernard-of-clairvaux/

https://www.biblicaltraining.org/learn/institute/th731-identity/th731-13-bernard-of-clairvaux

https://catholicinsight.com/2024/08/20/appreciating-the-wisdom-of-the-last-of-the-fathers-saint-bernard-of-clairvaux/

Just War Theory

Last time I asked A.I.: Aquinas' Just War Theory is part of Catholic Catechism is it not? What are its central contentions?

"Yes—Aquinas’ Just War Theory is embedded in Catholic teaching and appears in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC §2309). Its central contentions are that war can only be morally justified under strict conditions: legitimate authority, just cause, and right intention."


"📖 Aquinas’ Original Framework

"In the Summa Theologica (II–II, Q.40), Aquinas distilled three conditions for a just war:

  1. Legitimate Authority: Only rulers or sovereign powers may declare war. Private individuals cannot wage war.
  2. Just Cause: War must be fought to avenge a wrong or defend against aggression. It cannot be for conquest or gain.
  3. Right Intention: The purpose must be to promote good or avoid evil—never for cruelty, vengeance, or domination."

"📖 Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC §2309)

"The Catechism expands Aquinas’ principles into modern criteria:

  • Grave and Certain Damage: The aggressor must inflict lasting, grave, and certain harm.
  • Last Resort: All other means of resolving the conflict must be impractical or ineffective.
  • Prospects of Success: There must be serious chances of success; futile wars are unjust.
  • Proportionality: The use of arms must not produce evils greater than the evil to be eliminated."

"These conditions are evaluated by those responsible for the common good (i.e., legitimate governments)."


"⚖️ Central Contentions

  • War is not inherently sinful, but it is only justifiable under strict moral limits.
  • Authority, cause, and intention are the three pillars from Aquinas.
  • The Catechism adds prudential safeguards: proportionality, last resort, and likelihood of success.
  • The framework is designed to prevent wars of ambition, greed, or ideology, and to ensure war is truly defensive or restorative."

"🧩 Symbolic Reading

"Aquinas’ theory is a containment ethic: it ritualizes violence within moral boundaries. In Catholic thought, it functions as a diagnostic tool—testing whether war is truly defensive or merely disguised aggression."


"Would you like me to map how Aquinas’ framework influenced later doctrines—from Augustine to Grotius to modern international law—so you can see its continuity into today’s debates on humanitarian intervention?"

Sources:

https://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/19904/frontmatter/9781107019904_frontmatter.pdf

https://ncregister-dev-publisher.ncregister.com/blog/dmq-just-war-2-s3rijmxb

https://catholicinsight.com/2025/06/17/a-short-primer-on-just-war-theory/

https://catholic-church.org/~kofc11987/public_html/CATHOLIC%20DOCTRINE%20ON%20JUST%20WAR%20DOCTRINE%20TODAY.pdf

It is the provision on Grave and Certain Damage that seems problematic. Is it a justification for genocide? The ultimate certainty?

"That’s a very sharp and ethically charged question, Gary. Let’s unpack it carefully."


"📖 The Catechism’s Clause

"The Catechism of the Catholic Church (§2309) says war may only be justified if:

'the damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or community of nations is lasting, grave, and certain.'”

"This is meant to set a high threshold: war is only permissible if the threat is undeniably catastrophic and no other means can stop it."


"⚖️ Why It’s Problematic

  • Ambiguity of 'grave and certain': Who decides what counts as grave enough? States often exaggerate threats to justify war.
  • Risk of Absolutism: If interpreted as 'ultimate certainty,' leaders could claim that annihilating an enemy is the only way to prevent grave harm. That logic can slide toward genocidal rationalizations.
  • Historical Misuse: Totalitarian regimes have invoked existential danger to justify mass violence (e.g., Nazis claiming Jews posed a 'grave and certain' threat to the Volk)."

"🧩 Catholic Safeguards

"The Catechism doesn’t stop at 'grave and certain damage.' It adds other conditions:

  • War must be a last resort.
  • There must be serious prospects of success.
  • The use of arms must not produce greater evils than the evil to be eliminated."

"These proportionality and prudential checks are designed to prevent genocide. Genocide, by definition, produces evils far greater than any threat it claims to eliminate."


"🚫 Not a Justification for Genocide

  • In Catholic moral theology, genocide is always condemned as intrinsically evil.
  • The 'grave and certain damage' clause is about defensive war against aggression, not offensive extermination.
  • If interpreted correctly, it narrows the scope of just war rather than expands it."

"🧩 Symbolic Reading

"Your instinct is right: the clause carries a dangerous ambiguity. It can be weaponized by regimes seeking 'ultimate certainty' through annihilation. But within Catholic doctrine, it is bounded by proportionality and moral absolutes that forbid genocide."


"So: No, it is not a justification for genocide in Catholic teaching—but yes, its language is vulnerable to abuse by those who want to cloak mass violence in moral rhetoric."

"Would you like me to trace historical cases where 'grave danger' rhetoric was used to rationalize mass violence—from crusades to modern wars—so we can see how this clause has been stretched or misused?"

Would Aquinas have endorsed pre-emptive war?

"Aquinas’ framework makes this a subtle question. He never explicitly discusses 'pre‑emptive war' in the modern sense, but we can infer from his Summa Theologica (II–II, Q.40) and the tradition he draws on:


"📖 Aquinas’ Conditions

  1. Legitimate Authority – Only rulers may declare war.
  2. Just Cause – War must be fought to avenge a wrong or repel aggression.
  3. Right Intention – The aim must be to promote good or avoid evil, not cruelty or domination."

"⚖️ Implications for Pre‑emptive War

  • Reactive, not Preventive: Aquinas frames war as a response to actual injury or ongoing aggression. His 'just cause' is tied to redressing wrongs, not hypothetical threats.
  • No Explicit Endorsement: He does not articulate a doctrine of striking first to prevent possible harm.
  • Later Interpretations: Some scholastic and modern thinkers (e.g., Francisco de Vitoria, Hugo Grotius) expanded the tradition to allow anticipatory defense if an attack was imminent and unavoidable. But this is a development beyond Aquinas.
  • Catechism Continuity: The modern Catholic Catechism (§2309) requires 'grave, lasting, and certain damage' by an aggressor. That language implies actual aggression, not speculative threats."

"🧩 Symbolic Reading

"Aquinas’ ethic is a containment framework: war is permissible only when injustice is already manifest. He would likely reject pre‑emptive war as too speculative, too prone to abuse, and lacking the 'certain wrong' required for just cause."


"So: Aquinas himself would not have endorsed pre‑emptive war. Later just war theorists stretched his framework to cover imminent threats, but his original teaching is reactive, not anticipatory."

"I can lay out a timeline of how 'anticipatory defense' entered just war theory—from Aquinas to Vitoria to modern international law—if you’d like to see how the concept evolved."

Obviously canon law is as subject to interpretation as the law of the land. Let's look at the Timeline of St. Thomas vis a vis the Crusades and the Inquisition. Does he come before or after the two moments in history?

"Great framing, Gary. Let’s situate St. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) against the two major currents you mention: the Crusades and the Inquisition."


"⏳ Timeline Context

"The Crusades (1095–1291)

  • The First Crusade was launched in 1095, long before Aquinas was born.
  • By Aquinas’ lifetime, the Crusading movement was still active:
    • The Fifth Crusade (1217–1221) had just ended when he was born.
    • The Seventh Crusade (1248–1254, led by Louis IX) occurred during his youth.
    • The Eighth Crusade (1270) happened just four years before his death.
  • Aquinas therefore lived during the later Crusades, and his theology was shaped in a world where crusading was still a central Catholic practice."

"The Inquisition

  • The Papal Inquisition was formally established in 1231 by Pope Gregory IX, when Aquinas was about six years old.
  • It was designed to combat heresy (especially Catharism in southern France).
  • Aquinas matured in a Church where inquisitorial structures were already in place. His writings on heresy and the authority of the Church reflect this context.
  • The Spanish Inquisition, often most remembered, came much later (1478), long after Aquinas."

"📖 Positioning Aquinas

  • Relative to the Crusades: He comes after the early Crusades but lives through the later ones. His theology is contemporary with crusading ideology, though he himself was not a crusade preacher.
  • Relative to the Inquisition: He comes after its institutional birth. His scholastic work is contemporaneous with the Papal Inquisition’s early enforcement."

"⚖️ Symbolic Reading

"Aquinas is not the originator of crusading or inquisitorial logic, but he is a systematizer:

  • He codifies just war theory in a period when crusades were still being waged.
  • He articulates theological frameworks in a Church already deploying inquisitorial power.
  • His position is midway: not the initiator, but the intellectual anchor who gave scholastic legitimacy to practices already underway."

"So: Aquinas comes after the launch of the Crusades and after the establishment of the Inquisition, living in their shadow and systematizing theology in their midst."

"Would you like me to sketch a chronological chart—placing Aquinas alongside the Crusades and the Inquisition—to visualize how his life overlaps with these currents?"

So he never mentions the Crusades or apologizes for them?

"That’s right—Aquinas never explicitly mentions the Crusades in his writings, nor does he offer an apology or critique of them. His Summa Theologica and other works focus on systematizing theology, ethics, and philosophy, not on narrating or defending specific historical campaigns."


"📖 Why He Doesn’t Address Them Directly

  • Genre & Purpose: Aquinas was writing scholastic theology, not polemical tracts or papal bulls. His concern was abstract principles (justice, authority, intention), not the particulars of crusading expeditions.
  • Context: By his lifetime (1225–1274), crusading was already an established institution of the Church. It was taken for granted as part of Christian life, so he didn’t need to justify it anew.
  • Focus on Principles: His Just War framework (Summa II–II, Q.40) provides the moral scaffolding that crusades could be slotted into, but he never says 'the Crusades are just wars.'”

"⚖️ Symbolic Position

  • After the Crusade Preachers: Earlier figures like Bernard of Clairvaux explicitly preached and justified crusades. Aquinas comes later, codifying general war ethics rather than crusade propaganda.
  • In the Shadow of the Inquisition: He lived during the rise of inquisitorial structures, and his writings on heresy and Church authority resonate with that context—but again, he doesn’t name the institution.
  • Systematizer, not Apologist: Aquinas provided the intellectual framework that could be used to justify crusades, inquisitions, or other wars, but he himself didn’t engage in apologetics for them."

"🧩 Reading Him Today

"Aquinas’ silence is telling. He didn’t need to defend crusades—they were normalized. His role was to codify the moral grammar of war so that crusades (and other conflicts) could be interpreted as 'just' within that system."


"Would you like me to trace how later theologians and canonists explicitly applied Aquinas’ just war principles to the Crusades, showing how his abstract framework became a tool of crusade justification?"

Does Aquinas ever make a sketch of the 'Christian Soldier' and if so what is his definition?

The Regulatory Fiction of Essential Goodness

Why IFS Doesn’t Prevent Compassion Fatigue IFS and the Unspoken Promise Internal Family Systems (IFS) does not explicitly claim to reverse b...