Last time A.I. intimated that Leslie Kean does not dismiss the abduction phenomenon but simply holds it to a higher evidentiary standard than the late Budd Hopkins.
"Kean’s approach is more journalistic and restrained, emphasizing corroborated data and high-credibility sources. But she doesn’t dismiss the abduction phenomenon outright—she simply holds it to a higher evidentiary standard. Her relationship with Hopkins seems to reflect a kind of epistemological pluralism: honoring the sincerity and impact of his work while carving out her own path rooted in investigative rigor."
"If you’re interested, we could explore how this dynamic mirrors broader tensions in anomalous research—between experiential testimony and empirical validation, or between mythic resonance and methodological caution. It’s a fascinating fault line. Want to dig into that?"
http://johnemackinstitute.org/2011/08/budd-hopkins/
Hopkins was not a clinical hypnotherapist?
"Correct—Budd Hopkins was not a licensed clinical hypnotherapist. He was a self-taught investigator who collaborated with psychologists and psychiatrists to conduct hypnotic regressions, especially in the early stages of his abduction research. While he became one of the most prominent figures in the alien abduction field, his use of hypnosis was often informal and controversial."
"Hopkins relied on hypnosis as a tool to recover what he believed were repressed memories of abduction experiences. However, critics—including some of his later collaborators like Carol Rainey—raised concerns about his lack of formal training and the potential for suggestibility and memory contamination. Even Leslie Kean, who respected his legacy, took a more cautious stance on hypnosis, preferring methods grounded in verifiable data and peer-reviewed research."
"Hopkins’ role was more akin to that of a cultural investigator and advocate than a clinician. His influence came from his ability to give voice to experiencers and shape public discourse—not from formal therapeutic credentials."
"If you’d like, we could explore how this tension between authority and authenticity plays out in other anomalous research communities. It’s a fascinating lens on epistemology and trust. Want to go there?"
What was [Kean's] involvement in the Grusch whistleblower case?
"Leslie Kean played a pivotal role in bringing the David Grusch whistleblower case to public attention. Alongside journalist Ralph Blumenthal, she co-authored the June 2023 exposé in The Debrief that first revealed Grusch’s claims: that the U.S. government possesses retrieved craft of non-human origin and has operated secret crash retrieval and reverse-engineering programs for decades."
"Kean vetted Grusch’s credibility by interviewing high-level intelligence officials, including retired Army Colonel Karl Nell and a pseudonymous current intelligence officer known as 'Jonathan Grey.' Both corroborated Grusch’s claims and vouched for his integrity. Nell even described Grusch as 'beyond reproach'."
"Interestingly, Kean and Blumenthal initially approached major outlets like The New York Times and The Washington Post, but those publications declined or delayed. Kean later explained that they felt urgency to publish due to harassment Grusch was receiving and the risk of misinformation spreading online."
"Her involvement wasn’t just journalistic—it was also strategic. She helped navigate the legal and security clearance protocols to ensure Grusch’s statements were cleared for publication by the Department of Defense. This added a layer of legitimacy to the story, even as it sparked intense debate across scientific, political, and media circles."
"Kean didn’t endorse Grusch’s claims as fact, but she treated them as credible testimony worthy of public scrutiny, consistent with her long-standing approach: follow the evidence, not the hype."
"Would you like to explore how this case compares to earlier whistleblower narratives, or how Kean’s epistemological stance differs from more speculative figures in the field? There’s a lot to unpack."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Grusch_UFO_whistleblower_claims
https://thedebrief.org/intelligence-officials-say-u-s-has-retrieved-non-human-craft/
Propaganda is legal in the United States?
"It’s a nuanced picture. Propaganda is not outright illegal in the United States, but there are legal and institutional boundaries—some clearer than others—around how and when it can be used, especially by the government."
"Historically, the Smith–Mundt Act of 1948 prohibited the U.S. government from disseminating propaganda intended for foreign audiences within the U.S. itself. This was meant to prevent the government from influencing domestic public opinion using its own international messaging tools."
"However, in 2013, the Smith–Mundt Modernization Act amended that restriction. It allowed materials produced by agencies like the State Department and the Broadcasting Board of Governors (now the U.S. Agency for Global Media) to be made available domestically—but not for the purpose of influencing U.S. citizens."
"That said, the line between 'informing' and 'influencing' can be blurry. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) distinguishes between:
" - Publicity (informing the public about government programs),
" - Propaganda (covert or partisan influence), and
" - Self-aggrandizement (puffing up an agency’s image)."
"There are also annual appropriations laws that prohibit the use of federal funds for 'publicity or propaganda' unless specifically authorized by Congress. But enforcement is rare and often deferential to agency intent."
"So while covert or partisan propaganda by the government is restricted, informational campaigns, public relations efforts, and even emotionally charged messaging are often legal—especially when framed as public education or national interest."
"If you're thinking about this in the context of UAP disclosure, media narratives, or symbolic influence, we could explore how these legal frameworks intersect with cultural myth-making and epistemic trust. Want to go there?"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_in_the_United_States
https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/5736
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/publicity_or_propaganda
Grusch is a former intelligence official?
"Yes, David Grusch is a former U.S. intelligence official with a significant background in national security. He served as an officer in the U.S. Air Force and later held senior civilian roles at both the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO)."
No comments:
Post a Comment