I asked A.I. to teach me about Trump's proposal to arm felons.
"The Trump administration has proposed reviving a long-dormant federal program that allows certain individuals with criminal convictions—including some felons—to apply for the restoration of their gun rights. Here's a breakdown of what this means and why it's stirring debate:
"What the Proposal Entails
- Restoration Pathway: The Department of Justice (DOJ) would create a process for individuals barred from firearm ownership to apply for relief. This includes a web portal to streamline applications.
- Eligibility Criteria: Violent felons, undocumented immigrants, and registered sex offenders would be excluded. The focus is on nonviolent offenders who can demonstrate they’re not a threat to public safety.
- Legal Basis: The proposal revives authority under 18 U.S.C. § 925(c), which allows the Attorney General to restore gun rights if the applicant is deemed safe and not contrary to public interest."
"Historical Context
- The program was active until the early 1990s, when Congress defunded it due to concerns about public safety and misuse.
- Past recipients included individuals convicted of serious crimes, some of whom reoffended after regaining gun access."
"Legal and Political Implications
- Supreme Court Influence: The move aligns with recent rulings expanding Second Amendment protections, which have led to over 1,000 challenges to the federal felon-in-possession ban.
- Executive Order: Trump’s directive also calls for the DOJ to stop defending certain gun regulations in court, potentially weakening enforcement of existing laws.
- Mixed Reactions:
- Supporters argue it restores constitutional rights and offers second chances to nonviolent individuals.
- Critics warn it could put guns in dangerous hands and circumvent congressional authority."
"This proposal isn’t just about policy—it’s a flashpoint in the broader debate over gun rights, rehabilitation, and public safety. Would you like to explore how this intersects with constitutional law or community resilience?"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-admin-proposes-major-change-to-gun-laws/ar-AA1IRU94
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-admin-proposes-major-change-gun-laws-2100969
https://vpc.org/trump-administration-reviving-federal-guns-for-felons-program/
https://firearmslaw.duke.edu/2025/02/trumps-latest-executive-order-on-firearms
Are "drug lords", drug dealers, gangs, precluded from applying?
"Yes—Trump’s proposal to restore gun rights excludes violent felons, and that likely includes individuals convicted of drug trafficking, gang-related crimes, or offenses tied to organized criminal networks."
"Here’s how it breaks down:
"Who’s Precluded from Applying
- Violent Felons: Those convicted of crimes involving violence are explicitly barred.
- Drug Traffickers: High-level drug dealers (often labeled as “drug lords”) typically fall under violent or organized crime categories.
- Gang Members: Especially those tied to violent offenses or firearm-related charges.
- Sex Offenders & Undocumented Immigrants: Also excluded from eligibility."
"The Justice Department has stated that the program will ensure 'violent or dangerous individuals remain disabled from lawfully acquiring firearms'. While some nonviolent drug offenders might technically qualify, the vetting process is designed to assess whether applicants pose a threat to public safety."
"If you're curious about how this intersects with rehabilitation, systemic justice, or Second Amendment debates, I’d be glad to unpack that."
What about those held to be nonviolent felons by the Courts who prove subsequently to be violent?
"That’s one of the thorniest issues in this debate—and it’s exactly why Trump’s proposal includes discretionary safeguards and exclusions for violent felons."
"The Risk of Misclassification
- Nonviolent ≠ harmless: Courts may classify someone as a nonviolent felon based on the nature of their conviction, but that doesn’t guarantee future behavior.
- Recidivism data shows that some individuals with nonviolent records do go on to commit violent acts. However, the DOJ’s historical review found that among thousands granted relief between 1985–1990, only 4 cases (0.2%) involved interpersonal violence."
"How the Proposal Addresses This
- Case-by-case vetting: Applicants must prove they’re not likely to act in a way that endangers public safety.
- Attorney General discretion: Final decisions rest with the DOJ, which can deny relief if there's any indication of risk.
- Exclusions remain firm: Violent felons, sex offenders, and others deemed dangerous are categorically barred."
"Accountability & Precedent
- Critics argue that even one mistake could be catastrophic. Supporters counter that Second Amendment rights shouldn’t be permanently revoked for nonviolent mistakes unless there's clear evidence of ongoing risk.
- The DOJ is also avoiding Supreme Court challenges by offering this administrative pathway, which some say could undermine broader constitutional rulings on gun rights."
"So while the system isn’t foolproof, it’s designed to be cautious. The real challenge is balancing constitutional restoration with public safety—a tension that sits at the heart of this entire initiative. Want to explore how this fits into broader frameworks of justice or symbolic sovereignty?"
https://yournews.com/2025/07/19/3656354/doj-proposes-rule-to-restore-gun-rights-for-some-nonviolent/
Are there any provisions for persons who would oppose restoration of a particular felon's gun rights?
"As of now, Trump’s proposal does not include a formal mechanism for third-party opposition to individual applications for gun rights restoration. The process is designed as an administrative review conducted by the Department of Justice, with final discretion resting with the Attorney General."
"What We Know About the Review Process
- Case-by-case evaluation: Applicants must demonstrate they’re not a danger to public safety and that restoring rights wouldn’t be contrary to public interest.
- No public hearings or objections: There’s no indication that victims, law enforcement, or community members can formally contest a specific application.
- Discretionary authority: The Attorney General has broad latitude to deny applications based on any evidence of risk, but that decision-making is internal to DOJ."
"Channels for Broader Opposition
"While individuals can’t oppose specific cases, there are ways to challenge the policy itself:
- Public comment period: The DOJ is accepting feedback on the interim rule via Regulations.gov, where citizens and organizations can express concerns about the program’s scope or safeguards.
- Congressional oversight: Lawmakers have protested the rule’s legality and urged DOJ to withdraw it, citing risks to public safety and violations of appropriations law."
"If you're thinking about how this intersects with intersubjective ethics or community sovereignty, we could explore models for participatory justice or restorative review. Want to go there?"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-admin-proposes-major-change-to-gun-laws/ar-AA1IRU94
https://www.scaringilaw.com/blog/2025/march/trump-administration-moves-to-revive-lawful-rest/
What positions do the Gubernatorial Candidates in Virginia hold on restoration of gun rights to felons?
"As of now, neither major gubernatorial candidate in Virginia—Abigail Spanberger (Democrat) nor Winsome Earle-Sears (Republican)—has made a direct public statement specifically addressing the restoration of gun rights to felons."
"Here’s what we can infer from their broader positions:
"Winsome Earle-Sears
- Emphasizes strict public safety measures, including tough stances on drug-related crimes and violent offenders.
- Has stated: “If you're a criminal, I'm sorry, you got to go.” This suggests a hardline approach that may not favor restoring gun rights to individuals with felony convictions."
"Abigail Spanberger
- Focuses on community challenges like affordability, education, and healthcare.
- While she hasn’t addressed gun rights restoration directly, her platform leans toward rehabilitation and systemic reform, which could imply a more nuanced or cautious stance on the issue."
"Virginia’s Current Law
- The Governor cannot restore firearm rights directly. Civil rights (like voting and jury service) must be restored first, and then individuals must petition a Circuit Court for gun rights restoration.
- Gov. Glenn Youngkin has made the process for restoring civil rights more selective, requiring individual applications and scrutiny."
"If you'd like, I can keep an eye out for any future statements from the candidates or help draft a public inquiry to their campaigns. Want to explore how this issue fits into broader frameworks of justice or symbolic sovereignty?"
https://www.restore.virginia.gov/
https://vsp.virginia.gov/services/firearms/restoration-of-firearm-rights/
What is the position of these candidates on Child Protection?
"Both Virginia gubernatorial candidates—Abigail Spanberger (Democrat) and Winsome Earle-Sears (Republican)—have addressed child protection primarily through the lens of child care access, education, and public safety, though their approaches differ in tone and emphasis."
"Abigail Spanberger
- Focus on Affordability & Workforce Development: Spanberger emphasizes expanding access to quality child care by investing in early childhood education and workforce training.
- Support for Public Education: She advocates for safe schools and quality education as foundational to child protection.
- Parental Involvement: Her campaign highlights her role as a public school mom and stresses the importance of parental engagement in education."
"Winsome Earle-Sears
- Winsome CARES Plan: Proposes a $200 million investment to:
- Clear child care waitlists
- Attract and retain educators
- Expand public-private partnerships
- School Choice & Safety: Advocates for parental choice in education and tough-on-crime policies to ensure children’s safety in communities.
- Cultural Framing: Her platform includes opposition to certain school curricula and policies she views as harmful to children, aligning with broader GOP 'parents’ rights' messaging."
"Both candidates recognize the urgency of child protection, but Spanberger leans toward systemic investment and equity, while Earle-Sears emphasizes parental control and safety enforcement. If you'd like, I can help you compare how these positions align with ethical frameworks like symbolic sovereignty or intersubjective justice."
What are their stances on Child Trafficking?
"Both Virginia gubernatorial candidates—Abigail Spanberger (Democrat) and Winsome Earle-Sears (Republican)—have addressed child trafficking as part of broader anti-human trafficking efforts, though their emphasis and involvement differ."
"Abigail Spanberger
- Legislative Focus: As a former member of Congress, Spanberger supported federal legislation aimed at combating human trafficking and protecting minors, including bills to improve survivor services and law enforcement coordination.
- Campaign Messaging: While she hasn’t released a detailed plan specific to child trafficking during her gubernatorial campaign, she has emphasized community safety, systemic reform, and support for vulnerable populations, which may encompass trafficking prevention and survivor support."
"Winsome Earle-Sears
- Public Advocacy: Earle-Sears has been vocal about the need to eradicate human trafficking, calling it “one of the most critical fights of our time” and emphasizing its impact on children and families.
- Support for Operation Silence Shattered: She backs this statewide initiative launched by the Youngkin administration, which:
- Targets trafficking on college campuses and in vulnerable communities
- Coordinates law enforcement and survivor services
- Has led to arrests and victim identification since its launch in January 2025
- Victim-Centered Approach: Earle-Sears supports trauma-informed responses and centralized efforts to dismantle trafficking networks"
"While both candidates oppose child trafficking, Earle-Sears has taken a more public-facing role in Virginia’s current anti-trafficking initiatives, whereas Spanberger’s record reflects federal legislative engagement. If you’d like, I can help map these positions onto ethical frameworks like symbolic sovereignty or intersubjective justice."
https://www.virginiascope.com/a-look-at-where-2025-gubernatorial-candidates-are-on-the-issues/
https://www.governor.virginia.gov/newsroom/news-releases/2025/january/name-1039814-en.html
The DOJ's stats on nonviolent felons appear inaccurate.
"You're not alone in questioning that—critics have raised concerns about how the DOJ classifies and tracks nonviolent felons, especially in light of recent policy shifts around gun rights restoration."
"Why the Accuracy Is Debated
- Broad Definitions: The DOJ often uses statutory definitions that lump together a wide range of offenses. For example, some drug-related or financial crimes may be labeled 'nonviolent,' even if they involved coercion or indirect harm.
- Court Challenges: Recent federal rulings (like Zherka v. Bondi) have upheld bans on gun ownership for nonviolent felons, citing historical precedent—even when the crimes were decades old and involved no physical violence.
- Data Gaps: The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) provides federal criminal case data, but critics argue it lacks granularity—especially in distinguishing between types of nonviolent offenses and tracking post-release behavior."
"What’s Changing
- The DOJ’s new rule to restore gun rights to nonviolent felons has prompted renewed scrutiny. Some legal analysts argue the agency is relying on outdated or incomplete data to justify the policy shift.
- Others point out that recidivism rates and risk assessments used in past reviews may not reflect current realities, especially with evolving definitions of public safety."
"If you're exploring this from a justice reform or symbolic sovereignty angle, we could dig into how data integrity shapes ethical policy-making. Want to go there?"
https://thereload.com/newsletter-non-violent-felons-face-setback-in-federal-courts/
https://www.justice.gov/doj/statistics-available-department-justice
https://www.survivalworld.com/second-amendment/felons-could-soon-regain-gun-rights-under-new-rule/
The Court determinations of nonviolent status in Virginia appear to call for increased scrutiny in light of Trump's actions.
"You're tapping into a real tension point, Gary—Virginia’s classification of 'nonviolent felons' is under renewed scrutiny now that Trump’s DOJ has revived the federal gun rights restoration pathway."
"Why Virginia’s Definitions Matter More Now
- State-Level Restoration: In Virginia, individuals must first have their civil rights restored by the Governor before petitioning a Circuit Court for firearm rights.
- Court Discretion: Judges determine whether someone poses a public safety risk, but the criteria for “nonviolent” status can vary widely—sometimes excluding contextual factors like coercion or indirect harm.
- Federal Disconnect: Even if Virginia restores rights, federal law may still bar firearm possession unless DOJ grants relief under 18 U.S.C. § 925(c)."
"Why Scrutiny Is Increasing
- Expanded Eligibility: Trump’s rule opens the door for thousands of nonviolent felons to apply for federal relief—even if their convictions involved complex or ethically gray conduct.
- Historical Concerns: Past reviews showed that some individuals granted relief later reoffended, prompting critics to question whether 'nonviolent' is too broad a label.
- Judicial Ambiguity: Virginia courts may rely on statutory definitions that don’t fully account for behavioral risk, especially in cases involving financial fraud, drug offenses, or organized crime."
"Ethical Implications
"This isn’t just a legal issue—it’s a question of symbolic sovereignty and intersubjective justice. If courts grant restoration based on narrow definitions, communities may feel excluded from decisions that affect their safety. And if federal relief bypasses state-level scrutiny, it could erode trust in local governance."
"Would you like to explore how participatory justice models could offer a more transparent and accountable framework for rights restoration? Or how symbolic sovereignty might inform a more ethically grounded approach?"
https://vsp.virginia.gov/services/firearms/restoration-of-firearm-rights/
https://www.survivalworld.com/second-amendment/felons-could-soon-regain-gun-rights-under-new-rule/
What is the statistical likelihood a drug lord or dealer or gang member or both will be involved in or connected to gun violence in the State of Virginia? Any studies?
"The connection between drug trafficking, gang activity, and gun violence in Virginia is well-documented, though precise statistical likelihoods for individual offenders are harder to pin down due to data limitations. Still, several studies and state-level reports offer compelling insights:
"Key Findings from Virginia Data
- 84% of homicides in Virginia in 2022 involved firearms, up from 71% in 2013.
- Aggravated assaults involving firearms rose by 53% over the past decade.
- Gun-related assault injuries disproportionately affect young males aged 15–34, with 77% of victims being Black/African American and 47% of incidents occurring in Eastern Virginia—regions often associated with gang and drug activity.
- Stimulant-related drug arrests (e.g., methamphetamine) increased by 288% from 2013 to 2022, suggesting a rise in trafficking activity.
- Gang-related gun violence is a major concern in cities like Richmond, Norfolk, and Petersburg, prompting initiatives like Ceasefire Virginia, which targets repeat offenders and gang members."
"Studies Linking Gangs, Drugs, and Gun Violence
- A 2020 multistate study found that counties with higher concentrations of firearm dealers and gang activity had elevated risks of drug-related and gang-related homicides.
- The Richmond Youth Gang and Gun Violence Assessment revealed that 68% of surveyed residents viewed gun violence as a pressing issue, with many linking it to gang dynamics and drug markets."
"Risk Factors
"While Virginia doesn’t publish a single statistic like 'X% of drug dealers commit gun violence,' the convergence of:
- High firearm involvement in violent crime
- Rising stimulant trafficking
- Geographic clustering of gang activity strongly suggests that individuals involved in drug trafficking or gangs face elevated statistical risk of being involved in gun violence—either as perpetrators or victims."
"Would you like help mapping these findings to a policy framework or ethical model like symbolic sovereignty or restorative justice?"
Where did you say voters can contact the DOJ with suggestions about this action by Trump?
"You can submit public comments on the DOJ’s proposed rule to restore gun rights via the official federal platform: Regulations.gov."
"The Department of Justice is actively seeking input from:
- Law enforcement agencies
- Victims’ advocates
- Elected officials
- Concerned citizens"
"They recommend that individuals comment on the proposed process itself, rather than submit applications just yet. The rule is still in its interim phase, and feedback will help shape its final form."
"If you'd like, I can help you draft a comment that reflects your concerns about community involvement, victim testimony, or definitional clarity around “nonviolent” status. Want to collaborate on that?"
Let's see your draft incorporating your stats.
"Absolutely, Gary—here’s a strong draft comment you could submit to the Department of Justice via Regulations.gov. It synthesizes statistical insight and ethical concerns into a clear appeal for reform:
"Subject: Public Comment on Gun Rights Restoration for Nonviolent Felons
"To Whom It May Concern,
"I submit this comment in response to the Department of Justice’s proposed rule to reinstate firearm rights for individuals classified as 'nonviolent felons.' While I recognize the importance of rehabilitation and constitutional integrity, I urge the DOJ to reevaluate the definitions, risk assessments, and procedural safeguards underlying this policy."
"The classification of 'nonviolent' offenses lacks critical granularity. In Virginia, for example, judicial determinations often rely solely on statutory definitions without accounting for indirect harm, coercive conduct, or community context. Victims are excluded from restoration proceedings, and there is no mechanism for community testimony or safety impact assessments. Such omissions undermine symbolic sovereignty and public trust."
"Consider these Virginia-specific data points:
- In 2022, 84% of homicides in the state involved firearms.
- Aggravated assaults with firearms rose 53% over the past decade.
- Stimulant-related drug arrests (e.g., meth trafficking) rose by 288% from 2013–2022—trafficking that often correlates with gang activity and weapons use.
- Gun violence clusters in areas like Richmond, Norfolk, and Petersburg, where gang-related violence and trafficking converge. Initiatives like Ceasefire Virginia explicitly target offenders from these networks."
"Given this reality, the proposed restoration framework must adopt stronger safeguards. Specifically, I recommend:
- Mandatory victim notification and input during firearm rights petitions.
- Transparent risk assessment protocols that incorporate behavioral context, not just conviction labels.
- Exclusion of individuals with documented gang affiliations or trafficking convictions, even if technically classified as nonviolent.
- Independent community safety reviews before approval of any petition."
"Rehabilitation should not mean erasure of communal impact. Restoration of rights must operate within an intersubjective and ethically grounded framework—one that balances individual justice with collective resilience."
"Thank you for your time and consideration."
Sincerely,
American [Last Name, optional]
Town, State America
"Would you like to personalize or expand any part of this before submission? We could strengthen specific angles—symbolic sovereignty, restorative justice, or community protection—depending on what you want to emphasize."
Some news reports indicate the Trump Family is in the Arms Industry. Are these reports accurate?
"Yes, those reports are accurate—Donald Trump Jr. is actively involved in the firearms industry, particularly through his role with the online gun retailer GrabAGun."
"Key Details
- Trump Jr. is a board member, shareholder, and advisor to GrabAGun, a Texas-based firearm e-commerce platform that recently went public on the New York Stock Exchange.
- He reportedly owns 300,000 shares, about 1% of the company’s stock.
- The company merged with Colombier Acquisition Corp. II, a SPAC led by Republican megadonor Omeed Malik.
- GrabAGun markets itself as the 'Amazon of guns,' targeting younger demographics with features like 'shoot now, pay later' financing."
"Political and Cultural Framing
- Trump Jr. has described the company’s public debut as a 'vindication' against woke corporate culture, positioning it within the broader 'patriotic parallel economy'.
- He’s also a partner in 1789 Capital, an investment firm backing conservative-aligned ventures, including GrabAGun."
"Broader Arms Industry Connections
"While Donald Trump Sr. has not been directly linked to ownership in arms companies, his administration and post-presidency actions—such as executive orders streamlining foreign weapons sales—have significantly benefited U.S. defense contractors."
"So while the Trump family isn’t manufacturing weapons themselves, they’re financially and politically intertwined with the arms industry, especially through Trump Jr.’s ventures. Want to explore how this intersects with symbolic sovereignty or economic influence in political ecosystems?"
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/16/trump-jr-grabagun-stock-gun-merger.html
https://www.ft.com/content/a30941cb-feb6-47ce-a409-752fd4da1cc0
https://responsiblestatecraft.org/arms-sales/
Is either Trump, the President and Trump Jr., an advocate of Victims' Rights?
"The record is mixed—and in some cases, contradictory."
"Donald Trump (President)
- Past Support: During his first term, Trump signed several bipartisan bills aimed at combating human trafficking and created the first-ever White House position focused solely on that issue.
- Title IX Changes: His administration narrowed definitions of sexual harassment and required live hearings with cross-examinations in campus cases—moves that many victims’ rights advocates said retraumatized survivors and discouraged reporting.
- Funding Cuts: In his current term, Trump has ordered freezes and reviews of federal grants to domestic violence nonprofits, including those under the Office on Violence Against Women (OVW). These actions have disrupted services like emergency shelter, legal advocacy, and counseling for survivors.
- Sanctuary City Grants: Cuts to DOJ funding for sanctuary cities have also impacted domestic violence programs that serve immigrant survivors."
"Donald Trump Jr.
- Public Statements: Trump Jr. has made inflammatory claims, such as calling transgender people “the most violent domestic terror threat” despite evidence showing they are disproportionately victims of violence.
- Epstein Commentary: He has publicly demanded the release of the Epstein 'client list,' framing it as a call for justice for victims of sex trafficking. However, critics argue this may be more politically motivated than rooted in sustained advocacy."
"Summary
"While both have taken actions that touch on victims’ rights—especially around human trafficking—their broader records include policy reversals, funding freezes, and rhetoric that many advocates view as harmful. Their support appears selective and politically framed, rather than consistently aligned with trauma-informed or survivor-centered principles."
"Would you like to explore how these dynamics affect federal protections or community-based responses to violence?"
https://www.victimscivilattorneys.com/news/victims-rights-under-a-new-trump-administration/
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/01/funding-freeze-domestic-violence-00206807
https://msmagazine.com/2025/02/11/trump-domestic-violence-funding-cuts-shelter-survivors/
https://www.advocate.com/politics/trump-jr-transgender-melissa-hortman
Are there any conservative sources taking a victims rights view on felon rights restoration and child trafficking cessation?
"Yes—there are several conservative-aligned sources and figures who advocate for victims’ rights in the context of both felon rights restoration and child trafficking prevention, though their emphasis often differs from progressive frameworks."
"On Felon Rights Restoration
"While many conservatives traditionally oppose broad restoration of rights to felons, some victims’ rights advocates within conservative circles support limited restoration—especially for nonviolent offenders—only after restitution is paid and victims are consulted:
- The Iowa Organization for Victim Assistance, cited in a 2019 report, opposed automatic restoration of voting rights to felons who hadn’t paid restitution, calling it 'offensive to victims'.
- Conservative lawmakers in Kentucky, Tennessee, and Florida have supported restoration bills that exclude violent offenders and sex criminals, aligning with victims’ rights concerns."
"On Child Trafficking Cessation
"Conservative advocacy is more unified and vocal here:
- The Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) has launched a Center for Combating Human Trafficking, partnering with red-state Attorneys General like Jason Miyares (VA) and Tim Griffin (AR) to host summits and push legislation focused on law enforcement coordination and survivor support.
- Republican lawmakers like Ted Poe (TX) and Karen Bass (CA) co-sponsored bipartisan bills such as the Justice for Human Trafficking Act and End Sex Trafficking Act, which emphasize victim services and prosecution of exploiters.
- Pam Bondi, Trump’s Attorney General pick, has a long record of supporting anti-trafficking efforts, including lobbying for Christian advocacy groups focused on survivor protection."
"Conservative Framing
- Emphasizes law-and-order solutions, tough sentencing, and protection of children from predators.
- Often supports safe harbor laws that divert trafficked youth from prosecution into services, though funding tends to favor enforcement over social support."
"If you’d like, I can help map these positions to ethical frameworks like symbolic sovereignty or intersubjective justice—or draft a policy brief that bridges conservative advocacy with community-based reform. Want to sketch that out?"
https://www.cpac.org/post/conservative-states-take-on-trafficking
https://19thnews.org/2025/07/trump-administration-human-trafficking/
The Regulations.Gov citation takes you to the NRA not the DOJ.
"You're absolutely right to flag that, Gary. The link I previously shared redirects to the NRA Institute for Legislative Action, which is commenting on the DOJ’s rule—not hosting it. That’s misleading if you're trying to submit feedback directly to the Department of Justice."
"Correct Way to Submit Comments
"To engage with the DOJ’s proposed rule on gun rights restoration, you should go to the official federal rulemaking portal:
"Regulations.gov – DOJ Gun Rights Restoration Docket
"Once there:
- Search for “DOJ firearm rights restoration” or “18 U.S.C. § 925(c)”
- Look for the interim final rule published around March 20, 2025
- Click into the docket and use the “Comment” button to submit your feedback
"Why This Matters
"The NRA article is informative but not the source. Submitting comments through their site won’t reach the DOJ’s official record. For your draft to carry weight, it needs to be filed directly through the federal portal."
"Would you like help navigating the portal or formatting your submission for maximum impact? I can walk you through the steps or help tailor your comment further."
Thanks for correcting that.
